Track the members of your group.  

: Firefox est un navigateur dj

:

Firefox est un navigateur dj trs respectueux, sa page About:config permet une configuration trs pointue (agir avec prudence)
Jai compil dans un PDF, tous les rglages de , , , , etc
Les cls nexistant pas, peuvent tre crs facilement. Toutes les modifications sont rversibles.
Je joins un lien de tlchargement scuris du PDF, il est valable 10 jours, si besoin aprs me le demander. Bien vous.

Top German court says maybe the Web should be more like television in order to protect copyright

Back in 2022, Walled Culture wrote about a legal case involving ad blockers. These are hugely popular programs: according to recent statistics, around one billion people use ad blockers when they are online. Thats a testament to the importance many people attach to being in control of their browser experience, and to a wide dislike of the ads they are forced to view. The 2022 case concerned

weniger Apps weniger an weniger /

'


Me: *starts watching a video about tracking and recommendation algorithms on the internet*

: "I wanna show you something --"

YouTube: *stops video to tell me to log in so that they can track me*

Well then.

Panduan Lengkap Tracking & Analytics Iklan dengan Google Analytics, Meta Ads Manager, danPixel

- Lengkap & Iklan dengan Analytics, Ads Manager, dan - Dalam dunia marketing modern, tidak lagi sekadar soal tampil di depan audiens, melainkan bagaimana mengukur efektivitas dan dampaknya terhadap . Banyak bisnis masih mengandalkan intuisi atau sekadar melihat jumlah klik untuk menilai kinerja

Am 28.08.2025 hat die die Ttigkeitsberichte 1820 (20212023) in einem Sammelband verffentlicht.

Themen sind u. a.:

2021 BAfG Digital, Funkmesszhler, LUGAS, Corona-Auswirkungen.

2022 Lschkonzepte, & , Zensus 2022, WhatsApp-Nutzung im Gesundheitsbereich.

2023 , Google Street View, Pur-Abo-Modelle, & Klingelkameras.

Alle Berichte abrufbar im :

Track your Group

(plovdiv.bg) (plovdivairport.com) : Incident de  brouillage du signal GPS.    

New High Score



Tor Browser 15.0a2 is out
Firefox ESR 140.2.0 updates
Security fixes & improved UX
NoScript 13.0.9, OpenSSL 3.5.2
Dropped AI/ML components
Android, macOS, Linux, Windows updates
Alpha build test & report bugs


If you're really serious about making a difference, you should start considering leaving YouTube, It's not enough to say this platform is trash to your viewers, most of them feel the trashy nature of it already (phone number requirement, centralized source of Information, ridiculous "community guidelines" and terms, , algorithms, advertisements.. and now Age verification by a Government ID and/or Face scan)

This doesn't mean ruining your content creator career in the process, if you're uploading to a different platform, chances are you already know the problem with YouTube, but just know that uploading to a different platform isn't the solution on it's own, just like using private front-ends isn't the ultimate solution, it's just a temporary fix.

while uploading to a second platform is great and it's much appreciated but unfortunately that alone doesn't incentivize (motivate) your followers to make the switch, you should take it a step further.

as long as you're treating the alternative as a backup solution instead of it being your future home, where your content and your community will live, then we don't have a chance against this tech giant, make the switch inside your mind first before asking your community to make it.

You work so hard to make that video, to the point where you'll start calling it a 'video project', and I agree.. it is a **project**.. it's a lot of work..

It's understandable why YouTube is the first platform you upload to, because you want people to see your work, what's the point of uploading that video (that you worked so hard to make) to an empty platform, a ghost city.. where no one will see it.. You go to YouTube for exposure, so use it for that.. just that.

**you don't have to upload everything to YouTube**, you're not there for engagement, you're there for people to see that you exist, if they want to see more of you, they should come to your primary platform, what you consider your future home to be, that home should be of course everything that YouTube isn't (No , No , No , No , No , No , No , No vague rules and legalese), use for exposure and your main platform for the content, a platform where you're not competing against ads that try to take your viewers attention.

Do you want to take it a step further

Upload short clips, teasers (shall we say) to YouTube, make a call to action in the end, "If you want to see the full version, the link is in the description"

YouTube has reached it's final stage, It can no longer offer anything useful to , now it's sole purpose is to be used as bridge for the next generation of video hosting platforms, ones that offer innovative ways to share and preserve humanity's knowledge, it's a huge gamble to trust a with that knowledge, they can restrict access to it, they can erase it, they can use it (and not in a good way e.g. training Ai), the moment you hit upload, It's not your content anymore, it's not your 'video project' anymore, it's a YouTube video.

I have seen content creators (who should know better) fall for the trap of convenience that YouTube set up for them, either by embracing the "pay or okey" model just so they don't see ads, and others going full normie and enabling memberships, leading their followers further into the surveillance ad machine, you should lead by example, content creators don't follow the crowds, the crowds follow content creators and leaving a platform is the most effective way to destroy it, you don't fight the system by staying in the system.

New paper in uses tag attachment innovation for and reveals that pregnant females like it warm and shallow doi.org/10.1111/jfb.16000

Das Plus impliziert einen Bezahlartikel.

heise+ :youtube: ohne : Wie Sie Videos ohne Unterbrechung schauen heise online

heise+ Ungestrt surfen mit Smartphone und Tablet c't Magazin

heise+ Wie Sie nervige und auf dem Desktop ausradieren c't Magazin :firefox: :google: :appleinc:

heise+ Ungestrt surfen: , Banner, und andere Qulgeister loswerden c't Magazin

heise+ So testen Sie Ihren auf c't Magazin

Ich habe einen wissenschaftlichen Konflikt.

Bei einigen Softwareunternehmen verstoe ich wissentlich gegen die AGB und lege mehr als einen (freien) Account an Einen echt benutzen ohne kritische Daten und einen digitalen Kanarienvogel.

Wieso mache ich das

In den AGBs werden zunchst Blocks und Lschung aller Accounts angedroht.
Gleichzeitig wird aber Datenschutz in interplanetarische Sphren gelobt, kein Logging, Tracking und dergleichen.

Hier besteht also ein Widerspruch. Und das Entdecken von Multiaccounts kann nur einhergehen, wenn Daten erhoben werden und ausgewertet werden.

Dann schlgt der digitale Kanarienvogel an. Fr Unternehmen, die zu den Werten stehen, wegen denen ihre Produkte erworben werden, ist das ein Dilemma und Konflikt.

I was watching Batman Forever (1995), with Jim Carrey as The Riddler and Val Kilmer as Batman. The following dialogue was near the end:

Batman: You've been sucking Gotham's brain waves and now you've devised a way to read men's minds.

The Riddler: Ha ha ha. You betcha! Soon my little box will be on countless TVs around the world, feeding me credit card numbers, bank codes, sexual fantasies, and little white lies. Into my head they'll go. Victory is inevitable. For if knowledge is power, then a god am I.

Interesting that what was once considered absolutely evil in 1995 is now a commonly accepted business practice of present day entities such as Google.

Meta and Yandex Disclosure: Covert Web-to-App Tracking via Localhost on Android

Mastodon says it can't comply with Mississippi's age verification law due to its decentralized, privacy-focused design .

Servers can set age limits, but the platform doesnt track users or store data, making enforcement difficult .
No central authority in the fediverse means no one can block Mississippi users .

No, thank you.

Neue Elektro-Fufessel Hessen zieht erste positive Bilanz heise online

Oh, the irony! The crusaders at have decided privacy is overratedbring on the Claude chat training! But wait, you'll need and cookies on firstbecause who doesn't love a little more tracking

Chipolo Card und Loop: -Tracker fr :appleinc: und :android: Mac & i

MacroFactor: A new diet tracker / food journal, this one has the ability to log food by simply taking a photo of it
#+

Bist du sicher, dass das ein -freier Service sein soll

Er funktioniert wenigstens, wenn man nur die -Domain in NoScript freischaltet aber ansonsten mchte das Teil fr meinen Geschmack viel zu vielen Domains Zugriff auf meinen Rechner verschaffen.

Nicht, dass andere Speedtests besser wren aber geht halt anders.

Brandenburgs Polizeiprsident: Mssen offen fr KI sein heise online

Met behulp van 357937 regels heeft AdGuard Home 9.68 % van de DNS-verzoeken gefilterd op advertenties. ()

This is the "welcome message" that the app greets me with today. The number of "partners" that Odysee wants to share my data with - *919* - is greyed out against a black background, so that it's barely legible. A maybe Something they're a bit ashamed of Let's tap "Reject All".


Nachverfolgung per : Universitt Melbourne missbrauchte Daten heise online

heise+ Ungestrt surfen: Werbung, Banner, Tracking und andere Qulgeister loswerden

Pop-Ups, Videos und andere Werbe-Ablenkungen stren beim Surfen. Oft tracken sie zudem den Nutzer. Wir zeigen, wie Sie sich gegen den Werbeterror wehren.

heise+ Ungestrt surfen mit Smartphone und Tablet

Mit den passenden Browsern, Erweiterungen und Apps werden Sie Werbung und Tracker auf Android und iOS nachhaltig los.

heise+ So testen Sie Ihren Browser auf Datenschutz

Mit diesen Tools finden Sie heraus, wie gut Ihr Browser vor Tracking und Werbung schtzt und wo Sie nachbessern sollten.

Digital Rights Management (DRM) doesnt work. Also: draft California law mulls mandatory DRM to preserve image provenance metadata, breaks Signal Messenger

Digital Rights Management (DRM) doesnt work. Also: draft California law mulls mandatory DRM to preserve image provenance metadata, breaks Signal Messenger

15-20 years ago we had a reasonable, common understanding that making data tamperproof or copy-resistant by law and/or to enforce artificial scarcity, was problematic. Identity credentials or basic copyright, fine, but Digital Rights Management (DRM) , , and now its back to save us from AI, and its bad.

For context: broadly I think that its better to add metadata to authentic things to prove their authenticity or provenance, rather than to do something silly like simply because there are so many more fake things in the world than authentic. However: labels are labels, we dont need to get into that argument right now.

But whatever happens we wouldnt legally forbid people, platforms and products from removing those labels. After all, the important thing is that an authentic thing can eventually be checked for authenticity if/where necessary, correct

You wouldnt want to reinvent legislative DRM, right

AB 853: California AI Transparency Act

Nope. California says more DRM please!. Apparently piece of legislation, (extract below) says, if I am reading this right:

What about Signal, then

Adding metadata to images is , and I cant imagine that it would alternatively be very happy about being forced to swallow and send full-sized images from user to user by default images which in pursuit of speed and performance are .

God knows what would happen to video, I have no idea.

Theres also an interesting sop in the legislation re: personal information. Clearly someone has had a go at making it okay to from images:

A large online platform shall not strip any data that is not reasonably capable of being associated with a particular user and that contains EITHER information regarding the type of device, system, or service that was used to generate a piece of digital content OR information related to content authenticity, or digital signature from content uploaded or distributed on the large online platform AND IT shall not retain any provenance data that contains EITHER personal information OR unique device, system, or service information that is reasonably capable of being associated with a particular user from content shared on the large online platform

And the text is clearly aimed at centralised platforms like Facebook without end-to-end encryption being an issue:

  1. its not requiring personal information to be stripped, but its preventing the big central platform from retaining any of it potentially a problem for child-abuse investigations
  2. but also: what does retain mean in the context of a user-to-user end-to-end encrypted app Are those now obligated to strip personal data
  3. and: youre only permitted to strip nerdy techy metadata if its not reasonably capable of being associated with a particular user the problem being that , so much so that , which is
  4. not to mention: , but thats beyond the scope of metadata.

Summary

This draft law is broken-as-designed.

Grade: D- you should know better than this.

Postscript / Update

As somebody on Reddit observed: you also need to contemplate the contents of your feed and observe how much of it actually comprises cropped screenshots from other platforms. This will entirely break the chain of trust which is held in the manifest, and thereby remove any signals of AI.

This is why it is important to expect the manifest to prove the authenticness of the authentic original, rather than to expect it to act as a label of fakeness that will somehow be meaningfully propagated from platform to platform.

Hence: this bill is attempting to close the wrong stables door after the elephant has bolted.

References

Bill Text

SEC. 2.Section 22757.3.1 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read:22757.3.1.

(a) A large online platform shall do both of the following:

(1) Use a label to disclose any machine-readable provenance data detected in content distributed on the large online platform that meets all of the following criteria:

(A) The label indicates whether provenance data is available.

(B) The label indicates the name and version number of the GenAI system that created or altered the content, if applicable.

(C) The label indicates whether any digital signatures are available.

(D) The label is presented in a conspicuous manner to users.

(2) Allow a user to inspect any provenance information in an easily accessible manner.

(b) A large online platform shall not do any of the following:

(1) Strip any system provenance data or digital signature from content uploaded or distributed on the large online platform.

(2) Retain any personal provenance data from content shared on the large online platform.

and

SECTION 1
(h)Large online platform means a public-facing social media platform, content-sharing platform, messaging platform, advertising network, stand-alone search engine, or web browser that distributes content to users who did not create or collaborate in creating the content that exceeded 2,000,000 unique monthly users during the preceding 12 months.


(m)(1) Personal provenance data means provenance data that contains either of the following:

(A) Personal information.

(B) Unique device, system, or service information that is reasonably capable of being associated with a particular user.

(2) Personal provenance data does not include information contained within a digital signature.

(n) Provenance data means data that is embedded into digital content, or that is included in the digital contents metadata, for the purpose of verifying the digital contents authenticity, origin, or history of modification.

(o) System provenance data means provenance data that is not reasonably capable of being associated with a particular user and that contains either of the following:

(1) Information regarding the type of device, system, or service that was used to generate a piece of digital content.

(2) Information related to content authenticity.

rgert sich brigens in seinem aktuellen Blogbeitrag darber, dass gerade angesichts dieser zunehmen Datensammelwut immer mehr Webseiten Sorry, du verwendest einen Werbeblocker anzeigen.

Auch wenn er sich mit dem Anschauen von mglicherweise noch einverstanden erklren knnte, das gleichzeitige hlt er fr absolut unmglich.

5 Wenn es um Nachverfolgung unserer Browsing-Aktivitten und -Interessen geht, denken viele erstmal an . Doch Cookies sind nur ein kleiner Teil dessen, wie Big-Tech-, Werbe- und andere -Firmen an unsere Online- (und damit auch Offline-)Aktivitten kommen wollen.

Shivan Kaul Sahib, hat zusammengefasst, wie wir heute online verfolgt werden. Und was Browser schon tun, um uns davor zu schtzen.

berraschung: tut am wenigsten. (NOT!)


Last updated: 2025-09-03






portrait